Thanks for this Peter. Debate on the future of GFL Charles airport is useful and necessary.
I believe the future of the GFL needs to be viewed alongside the substantial investment needed to develop Hewanorra into a decent international airport. GFL is now a drag on the finances of SLASPA. I do not agree that there will be any serious decline in arrivals to Saint Lucia if it is closed. An airport is not a destination. People do not travel to an airport. They visit a country and I believe they will do so if there was only one airport available. GFL's location near Vigie Beach is to my mind not a deciding factor; Hewanorra is also located near Anse des Sables. I am yet to be convinced of any social or economic benefits of keeping GFL open. I am convinced however that Saint Lucia does not need 2 airports.
Thanks for this Peter. Debate on the future of GFL Charles airport is useful and necessary.
ReplyDeleteI believe the future of the GFL needs to be viewed alongside the substantial investment needed to develop Hewanorra into a decent international airport. GFL is now a drag on the finances of SLASPA. I do not agree that there will be any serious decline in arrivals to Saint Lucia if it is closed. An airport is not a destination. People do not travel to an airport. They visit a country and I believe they will do so if there was only one airport available. GFL's location near Vigie Beach is to my mind not a deciding factor; Hewanorra is also located near Anse des Sables. I am yet to be convinced of any social or economic benefits of keeping GFL open. I am convinced however that Saint Lucia does not need 2 airports.
CSI