Mr. Prime Minister, does it bother you that three little GIRLS were killed on the Gros Islet road NINE YEARS ago, and to date they have not received JUSTICE???
Is this Ministry of Finance made up of largely of stand-up comics? The Finance Minister is supposed to set policy and be au fait with the sectoral impact of each detail of the annual recitation called the Budget. This is how you keep in control and rapidly take corrective action to stay on track, or to change course.
Yet, we have an unexpected anomaly here. Strangely, it is the executioner of policy details that is doing all the explaining. This begs the question. How much of the recitations do the Ministers of Finance past and present really understand of what was read to the parliament? Have they been playing a game of Russian Roulette with the economy?
If you cannot understand, far less explain what was recited how much confidence can ever be reposed in the likelihood of any positive impact of the policy details and instruments hailing from the measures spelt out, or steps to be taken?
Next, for a subject matter that depends so much on order, logic, and especially, deep knowledge and management of the underlying assumptions, how can any PM rely on the formulation of a recovery/turnaround policy that depends solely on the opinion, and the cognitive limitations of just one single person? Who is kidding whom here?
Mr. Prime Minister, does it bother you that three little GIRLS were killed on the Gros Islet road NINE YEARS ago, and to date they have not received JUSTICE???
ReplyDeleteIs this Ministry of Finance made
ReplyDeleteup of largely of stand-up comics?
The Finance Minister is supposed
to set policy and be au fait with
the sectoral impact of each
detail of the annual recitation
called the Budget. This is how
you keep in control and rapidly
take corrective action to stay on
track, or to change course.
Yet, we have an unexpected
anomaly here. Strangely, it is
the executioner of policy details
that is doing all the explaining.
This begs the question. How much
of the recitations do the
Ministers of Finance past and
present really understand of what
was read to the parliament? Have
they been playing a game of
Russian Roulette with the economy?
If you cannot understand, far
less explain what was recited how
much confidence can ever be
reposed in the likelihood of any
positive impact of the policy
details and instruments hailing
from the measures spelt out, or
steps to be taken?
Next, for a subject matter that
depends so much on order, logic,
and especially, deep knowledge and
management of the underlying
assumptions, how can any PM rely on the formulation of a
recovery/turnaround policy that
depends solely on the opinion, and the cognitive limitations of
just one single person? Who is
kidding whom here?
can somebody/anybody/life body/dead body/animal-body/un-"f324"-body/u-"F342"-BODY/
ReplyDeletehelp me understand this dead-brain @ 8:36 blog!
mate is in a class of his own at La-tock!!!!