However, we reserve the right to remove any comment considered inappropriate.
Saturday, September 17, 2011
‘Ah Deputy Essential!’
............
9 comments:
Anonymous
said...
I am so proud of myself. before reading this article, I made this exact observation, that the speaker should be guided by the standing orders and she was not in a position to rule on a constitutional motion. Furthermore, that the standing order was drafted to compliment the constitution and therefore one cannot reasonably argue that the relevant section regarding the deputy speaker is contradictory to the constitution. Even if it were, she would have to stick to the standing order for the time being and allow whoever disagreed to challenge it in court. The standing order clearly states that the post of ds must be appointed before the businness of the house continues. If the opposition had norminated one of their members, they would have to be seen as the worse enablers in this country. They are the ones who have been telling us how corrupt this government is.
@5:15 and 8:35pm. O! you two dolt. You pervert mad dope,crack-heads need to go back into La-toc. Try to elavate yourself from king standard of education. your minds are in the drains so drown and remain in it. Her face is all, youall can see, you incorrigible fool, her beauty have blinded your caca-poul brain with lust.Try and educate yourself in order to read what she have written. Or ask the madam spesker of the house to explain the contex of the constitution.as mrs,Anotheny have don. or ask Fredrick and rick-gay-for pay,to do the explanation. Her expounds and explicit explanation will put this matter to rest on the minds of thoes who belive their know and knows not the law. over to you gay-for pay and thread-dick,
These responses are clear and straight forward and demonstrate a professional integrity that is lost on those who suffer from a self-imposed ignorance that is exhibited by their personal attacks (ad hominem)on the eminent professor - a rather dishonest form of "argumentation".
Professor Antoine has pellucidly shown why the Speaker's ruling is erroneous.
Oh, and to all of those who who hide behind the "plague on both houses" cop-out that both government and the opposition bear equal responsibilty for the non-election of a DS,I ask can you in all honesty still cling to that patently blinkered and illogical view?
9 comments:
I am so proud of myself. before reading this article, I made this exact observation, that the speaker should be guided by the standing orders and she was not in a position to rule on a constitutional motion. Furthermore, that the standing order was drafted to compliment the constitution and therefore one cannot reasonably argue that the relevant section regarding the deputy speaker is contradictory to the constitution. Even if it were, she would have to stick to the standing order for the time being and allow whoever disagreed to challenge it in court. The standing order clearly states that the post of ds must be appointed before the businness of the house continues. If the opposition had norminated one of their members, they would have to be seen as the worse enablers in this country. They are the ones who have been telling us how corrupt this government is.
@5:15 and 8:35pm.
O!
you two dolt.
You pervert mad dope,crack-heads
need to go back into La-toc.
Try to elavate yourself from king standard of education.
your minds are in the drains
so drown and remain in it.
Her face is all, youall can see,
you incorrigible fool,
her beauty have blinded your caca-poul brain with lust.Try and educate yourself in order to read what she have written.
Or ask the madam spesker of the house to explain the contex of the constitution.as mrs,Anotheny have
don. or ask Fredrick and rick-gay-for pay,to do the explanation.
Her expounds and explicit explanation will put this matter to rest on the minds
of thoes who belive their know and knows not the law.
over to you gay-for pay and thread-dick,
It's a porpot bouway.
ABOVE GO BACK TO YOUR HIDEOUT YOU CRAB AND LET THE POLICE SEND YOUR CABBAGE PORPOT-BOUWAY
BRAIN TO DE UNDERTAKER.
SHE CAN'T BE A PORPOT-BOUWAY
LIKE YOUR BRAIN,DE KING WIFE,YOUR
M----R,AND DE REST OF DE UWPPP
THIS REALY SUCKS.
These responses are clear and straight forward and demonstrate a professional integrity that is lost on those who suffer from a self-imposed ignorance that is exhibited by their personal attacks (ad hominem)on the eminent professor - a rather dishonest form of "argumentation".
Professor Antoine has pellucidly shown why the Speaker's ruling is erroneous.
Oh, and to all of those who who hide behind the "plague on both houses" cop-out that both government and the opposition bear equal responsibilty for the non-election of a DS,I ask can you in all honesty still cling to that patently blinkered and illogical view?
She looks so angry.
above
you are a vicious blatant arrogant
braggart scandalmonger,
stop this vigil.
because you are only looking at yourself in a mirror.
Post a Comment