Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
However, we reserve the right to remove any comment considered inappropriate.
About Me
Blog Archive
-
▼
2013
(4529)
-
▼
September
(426)
- Talented Teen Cricketer Gets Support from BOSL
- Scratch and win over $50,000 in Cash and Prizes wi...
- Police and LIME Team Up for Road Safety
- One good turn deserves another Customer wins grand...
- BOSL invests in future chefs
- The Importance of Business Planning (Part 3 of 3)
- The Beauty Of Being Certified!
- The secret to long term financial success
- NRG Energy and Digicel Partner To Bring Renewable,...
- Martin Turner elected as ACCA President for 2013 / 14
- Know the Labour Act #8 will deal with Contracts of...
- Market Watch
- Etiquette rules for professional social situations
- End of the road for the ‘classic’ finance career?
- ECCU Secondary School Teachers Receive Training in...
- Deadline for Submissions to 2014 Business Awards i...
- What a Wick: the last 7 days in 11 (21st to 27th S...
- The Presentation Brothers: 66 Years Of Service To ...
- SLASPA’s Information Systems Department: Keeping I...
- Opening of the law year 2013-2014, Part 2
- Nation building 83
- Have I been assaulted,who will validate me or unit...
- Fit4Life – The New Year Revolution cont’d
- Diplomatic Courier
- Challenges and Opportunities with the Introduction...
- Carnival Prize Money Update
- An Alliance for Education
- Smile? Not a Chance!
- St. Lucia Boxers Off to Kazakstan
- St. Lucia Yacht Club Open Day, “Today”
- SLOC hosts Venezuelan delegation
- FIFA’S WORLD CUP TROPHY TOUR UNVEILED
- 5 Matches Carded For ECFH/LUCELEC Youth Football L...
- Who is listening to the IMF?
- Where Are They Now?
- Towards A Crime reduction or Prevention Strategy -...
- The Up And Downside Of Progress and Technology
- The Region’s Antiquated Thinking Politicians
- The Issuance of Birth Certificates in Saint Lucia-...
- Press Release from the Soufriere Marine Management...
- Obama: The cold logic of mass graves
- Kenny brings ALVA one peg down (MUSA to act PM)
- Dr. Jimmy Fletcher’s Attempt To restrict Press Fre...
- Women’s economic empowerment is critical to build ...
- THE LAPTOPS ARE HERE!
- Government Defends Labour Day Spending
- New UNAIDS Global Report points to gains and chall...
- “Seek to Create Jobs”
- Historian On FRC’s Dilemma
- Degazon awarded COTA Essay Competition prize
- Celebrating 38 Years of Conservation Work
- An Inhospitable Host
- CIBC FirstCaribbean employees to walk for the cure...
- Bottoms Up At Wenneker Liqueurs Cocktail Exposure!
- All-Star line-up for Arthur Guinness Day
- SLNCA Premier League Semi Final This Weekend
- SCHOOL SPORTS LAUNCH
- Local Sports Organizations/Clubs Called Up To Regi...
- ECFH/LUCELEC Youth Football: 28 Goals scored in 8 ...
- CSL Games 2/3: Win for NYAH and Valley Soccer
- BOSL Major Sponsor For SLNCA T20
- UWP Issues Call For LIAT To Be Over-hauled
- The Lessons we should teach
- SLP hypocrisy on gambling continues
- Resignation of LIAT’s CEO
- LIAT shareholders taken to task by Dominican hotelier
- Kwéyòl Oral Poetry Entrance Rules
- Goodbye GIS – PART 2
- Comments re: Micah George article
- Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela Ministry of the P...
- Saint Lucia to host “Love Elevated” Wedding Symposium
- ‘ORANGE DAY’ WITH NYC.......
- Japan Festival Scores!
- Jamaican Duo to Headline Guinness Concert!
- Island Neighbours
- Dreams
- Barefoot Holidays St. Lucia - “Caribbean’s Leading...
- Winners of Super J IGA Summer Fun Promotion Treate...
- KFC cuts cheque for Cutty Ranks
- Mille Fleurs Coop seeks to upgrade operations
- Daily Markets Wrap Up – Monday, September 23rd, 2013
- U.S. ordered to disclose payments to reporters cov...
- Regis Advises Current And Past Students Of Vieux F...
- Quotable Caribbean
- Nation Building 81
- “FRC’s Not For Sale!”
- SLNCA T20 To Bowl Off In October
- Nine teams ready to compete at Men’s Continental C...
- INAUGURAL CHAMPIONS
- Aux Lyon United EC Global U - 20 Champions
- Why the Secrecy on ALBA?
- Why Our Political Hypocrisy Is Crime’s Best Friend
- Things Unpleasant At Mount Pleasant
- Tall Order for Chastanet
- Some Pertinent Petro Caribe Questions
- Saint Lucia Red Cross - First Aid and Road Safety
- Correction!
- The UN Secretary-General -- message on the Interna...
- STRIKING THE RIGHT NOTE
- POLICE NEWS
-
▼
September
(426)
11 comments:
Chastanet is a liar. Duplicitous. That was proven in the Tuxedo case regarding Keith Mondesir trying to steal customs duty from the Treasury. And Chastanet was covering up; aiding and abetting; and was found to be a bloody liar inn the High Court of the OECS.
And it is a crying shame that the UWPs were not smart enough to see and understand that a man with a reputation like this; in this day and age; ca never win his seat; far less to lead this country.
I once voted religiously for UWP but will not vote for Chastanet.
Chastanet is a liar. Duplicitous. That was proven in the Tuxedo case regarding Keith Mondesir trying to steal customs duty from the Treasury. And Chastanet was covering up; aiding and abetting; and was found to be a bloody liar inn the High Court of the OECS.
And it is a crying shame that the UWPs were not smart enough to see and understand that a man with a reputation like this; in this day and age; ca never win his seat; far less to lead this country.
I once voted religiously for UWP but will not vote for Chastanet.
If Chastanet is a liar and duplicitous - I wonder where you fit that damn lair and snake called Kenny? LOL
my bigest concern is why no party want to remove and separate the ministry of finance from any prime minister position.
Its high time to separate this to avoid all this bobol business from the past.
What is Micah afraid of that he cannot see that Chastanet himself is a mighty HUGE problem?
Chastanet is just a recycled piece of God knows what, that emerged from the Ali Baba goons that formed the so-called last UWP cabinet. Cabal sounds more like it.
The trademark indiscipline of that gang raised its ugly head again with that Soufriere bridge incident. There, UWP country bookies, rough-necks, ignoramuses and disgusting cads, all in tow and in support, showed up, disrespecting the rule of law and the rights of a duly elected government to govern, by resorting to stooping very low to incite a near riot.
All politics is local. Indeed. But how long must the rest of decent Saint Lucians live with the curse of having the scum of Saint Lucia being repeatedly recycled by the reprobates that make up the majority of the UWP?
Is the rest of decent society condemned in perpetuity, to have rolling convoys of marauding MPs especially from low-minded constituencies and from the most backward areas of the countryside, as representative of ALL Saint Lucians?
Does Chastanet, and the likes of him from that dastardly group of UWP racketeers, scumbags and slime-balls, IN ANY SIGNIFICANT WAY, represent ANY NOTICEABLE DEPARTURE from our recent sordid past and calamity, of having a drug baron, a past US jailed identity theft convict, a doctor selling patient records for profit, a minister giving questionable testimony before an OECS appellate court, an entire cabinet conniving, colluding and working in cahoots to give a fellow cabinet member, illegal tax concessions through a cabinet paper, and other confounded unsavoury characters, representing all decent and law-abiding Saint Lucians ON THE WORLD STAGE? Does he? Really? Does he?
To blogger @ 25th.Sep.at 7.52AM.
The truth is unfortunately, because of all the dastardly ignorant, two left foot stupid country bookies, slimy back water ignoramuses, that sorry lot, that unfortunate bunch, are the very ones who will vote HIM as the next prime minister of our country.YUK.
Mark my words Ti Chas and his Mongoose gang is history...
Some of you seem to think that the OECS court is the final court of appeal.It is not.Many times judges say things which have proven not to be correct.They have given decisions which have been overturned many times by higher courts.
Now,why would a higher court overturn decisions given by a lower court?I am sure the answer is evident to most people.
I am saying this because many persons are holding to what a judge said in relation to Chastenet.That was the judge's opinion.This judge was not the only one on the panel.The others did not say such.
What motivated the judge to say such?
Do any of you remember that Kenny Anthony was found guilty in the Rochemal scandal?Yes he was.He appealed and a higher court overturned the decision.This shows that a decision given by a judge may not neccessarily be correct.
Judges opinions are not gospel.Kenny Anthony had to appeal because given the decision against him he would have had to repay the Rochamel money which all of us are paying.However,why would Chastenet appeal against an opinion given by a judge who said so as a passing comment.
Those of you who keep using that to call Chastenet a liar should check the actual wording.
That passing comment was not central to the verdict.There was no need for Chastenet to appeal this because who would waste time on a judge's comment which in this case has no weight,no merit,was not called for and has no traction except with some people who want to oppose Chastenet.
Talking about LIARS;Kenny ANTHONY said that he wrote to the COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT asking for advise about the oil deal with Grynberg.The secretariat said it had never sent any letter to it.ISn't that lying?When Kenny said that he never told criminals to give the people a break for christmas wasn,t he lying?Yes he was because he did say it.This is not an opinion,IT IS A FACT.
There are hundreds of instances when Kenny has lied to St.Lucians,those of you who call Chastanet a liar what would you call Kenny Anthony? .
Chastanet is loaded. He has oodles of cash. Why did he not bring the judge to court for questioning his testimony?
Was the judgement created and read by all the judges on the panel? Or, is the previous blogger thinking that all judges on the panel in a case are entitled and required to give individual and public official statements on each case brought before them?
The mercantile and political who's who do that all the time in our little 2x4 islands, sue.
So was there a case to be overturned, granted the intense process of the recordings of cabinet meetings, of those present and absent? Or are we witnessing a case of amnesia or something a little more serious?
Write all the Gabbage you like, Ti Chas and his mongoose gang's ass is grass!
The bleating [for want of another word. I want my children to read this.] UWP apologists for continued political nastiness, and our mendicant yardfowls are out in full force.
UWP country bookies and ignoramuses never cease to amaze!
Good Lord, whenever did a defendant in case, claiming "I don't recall", or, "I have forgotten", or "I do not remember", or "My memory fails me", with the judgement or ruling of the court going against that defendant, ever rose to the level of a legal technicality, contestable in another court? Ever heard of this before?
So, why are those UWP dummies putting this out there for public consumption?
Who are they trying too fool? If only it is for their own quite massive backward, non-intelligent and very gullible political base, they are on very solid ground!
Post a Comment