If you are so darn partisan as not to see the repeated pattern that Kenny Anthony is always signing away, and having us pay for his foolishness mistakes, then you up there had better get a hold of the situation fast. We had been had with Roahasmell for $45 million, Black Black Bay for a repayment of $68(?) million, and now Grynberg in the vicinity of $250 million plus legal fees. All of these were signed by the PM.
The PM is acting like a teenager. He gets the rush of the excitement of signing agreements as the big boss, without, it would appear, paying any or careful attention to the embedded details and ramifications. We, in turn, as the taxpayers and final payers, not him, continue to pay for his lunatic financial decisions.
The question remains this. Why does someone with a legal background, and an ex-UWI lecturer, not have the perspicacity to pay the required attention to finding the loopholes and place the necessary safeguards in the verbiage of when framing contractual agreements? Why is it that we have the confounded pattern that so often, with such staggering sums and NATIONAL assets at such great risk, Saint Lucians are always getting the short end of the stick?
3 comments:
Offshore financial law? Did the student fail to pass the course, that is why Saint Lucia has lost the rights to the seabed in the Dauphin area?
BOY TRY 2 GET A NEW NOTE 4 YOUR OLD TRUMPET.
U CAN'T TOUCH THIS?
If you are so darn partisan as not to see the repeated pattern that Kenny Anthony is always signing away, and having us pay for his foolishness mistakes, then you up there had better get a hold of the situation fast. We had been had with Roahasmell for $45 million, Black Black Bay for a repayment of $68(?) million, and now Grynberg in the vicinity of $250 million plus legal fees. All of these were signed by the PM.
The PM is acting like a teenager. He gets the rush of the excitement of signing agreements as the big boss, without, it would appear, paying any or careful attention to the embedded details and ramifications. We, in turn, as the taxpayers and final payers, not him, continue to pay for his lunatic financial decisions.
The question remains this. Why does someone with a legal background, and an ex-UWI lecturer, not have the perspicacity to pay the required attention to finding the loopholes and place the necessary safeguards in the verbiage of when framing contractual agreements? Why is it that we have the confounded pattern that so often, with such staggering sums and NATIONAL assets at such great risk, Saint Lucians are always getting the short end of the stick?
Post a Comment