However, we reserve the right to remove any comment considered inappropriate.
Thursday, August 15, 2013
LPM Speaks Out on Francois Affair
10 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Prudent is doing nothing more here than trying to stay in the spotlight. There are no insights or new facts or truths to be had here. He reminds me of unelected and out of the House of Assembly Chastanet, grasping at straws to grab some attention. Those remarks are so full of empty!
I beg to differ. I think Mr. Prudent has said a lot here. Why don't you remove your red blinders and then you will understand the point his party has made. You don't have to be a junkie for politics to see that the LPM is making sense.
So just because flambeau did it when visa was revoke , SLP must do the same thing ? Are they not now one and the same ? Kenny was elected to do much better. He was not elected to follow the UWP style of doing things, if that is the case it's going to be the first and the last time they get my vote ,
You know? You so right. Some people are so busy trying to condone sh.T that its not even funny. I don't see nothing that the LPM say that wrong. I don't always agree with everything they say but on this one they are right. We have to stop this childish game of Tit for tat and trying out best to make others look foolish when in fact we are the more foolish. Right is right and wrong is wrong.
It is time we all know the truth about that visa thing.it is a shameful thing that is costing us economically.By the way is there an lpm or a one party.Prudent should just make his point instead of claiming to represent a party.What a shame!!!!
Some believe that there is some kind of party. In English law, a party can legally be just one single person. LPM is that kind of party. Prudent is all Chief. No Indians.
10 comments:
Prudent is doing nothing more here than trying to stay in the spotlight. There are no insights or new facts or truths to be had here. He reminds me of unelected and out of the House of Assembly Chastanet, grasping at straws to grab some attention. Those remarks are so full of empty!
I beg to differ. I think Mr. Prudent has said a lot here. Why don't you remove your red blinders and then you will understand the point his party has made. You don't have to be a junkie for politics to see that the LPM is making sense.
Which party? A single person without followers?
Why should SLP to inform the public the reson why, when UWP did not inform the public when a ministers visa was revoked?
Is'nt this the same?
So just because flambeau did it when visa was revoke , SLP must do the same thing ? Are they not now one and the same ? Kenny was elected to do much better. He was not elected to follow the UWP style of doing things, if that is the case it's going to be the first and the last time they get my vote ,
UWP did it; so does SLP = win/win situation for them both!!
Sick to my stomach!
You know? You so right. Some people are so busy trying to condone sh.T that its not even funny. I don't see nothing that the LPM say that wrong. I don't always agree with everything they say but on this one they are right. We have to stop this childish game of Tit for tat and trying out best to make others look foolish when in fact we are the more foolish.
Right is right and wrong is wrong.
Go ahead beggggggggg!
It is time we all know the truth about that visa thing.it is a shameful thing that is costing us economically.By the way is there an lpm or a one party.Prudent should just make his point instead of claiming to represent a party.What a shame!!!!
Some believe that there is some kind of party. In English law, a party can legally be just one single person. LPM is that kind of party. Prudent is all Chief. No Indians.
Post a Comment