Saturday, August 31, 2013

BATTLE OVER BRIDGE

38 comments:

MR. "T" said...

THEN Y DID U SHOW UP?

u are just the leader of the U W P
and just an ordinary cesspit, so stay in your place among those sewage waste who put u as they leader.

Anonymous said...

Some of our would-be politicians and those who aspire to higher office display a singular type of ignorance of the norms and conventions of the Westminster System of government.

It is either this, or a willful disdain for the orderly process of constitutional government, and a desire to flout all norms of common decency, and persist instead with the usual rogue party political behaviour, in pursuit of pure narrow personal objectives.

Common decency should have dictated the recognition that, not being in power means that political aspirants and their scumbag followers would have seen it fit not to appear at an opening ceremony in the 'uniform' of the opposing party.

By any decent standard of behaviour, that would unequivocally be regarded as provocative. Only nasty politicians engage in such dastardly behaviour. It raises the ire of those of party in power. Such confrontations are entirely unnecessary and unbecoming of current and would-be leaders of this country.

Those who engage in such behaviours of the cad are placing this country on a dangerous road, in pursuit of their political ambitions and yardfowlism.

But it all boils down to the sense of desperation facing some, who are in almost in the identical position of those seeking political jobs in STEP. They are unemployed. Perhaps, they may be even completely unemployable, save those political jobs.

That sense of desperation, underscored by the lack of anyone up to now agreeing to give up a safe UWP seat to accommodate essentially a carpetbagger, means that desperate people will do desperate things. To them, the end justifies the means.

Some of our politicians are not only divisive, but are overwhelmingly polarizing.

Are we about to return to the John Compton era of staging riots, as in the Valley, to gain political office?

Anonymous said...

Why don't this dope leave Compton alone. He is dead really dead instead you did not know!!!!

Anonymous said...

Blogger @ 3;30 Pm
Most of what you stated can easily be validated by the release of the tape.
Don't you find it strange that the SLP and sympathizers like you find so much fault with Chastenet's actions and yet a tape which can support your claim is in posession of the SLP GOVERNMENT and despite calls from the public for its release to the media that has not been done.
Everyone knows that if the tape showed what the SLP claimed it would have been released to the media houses the same day the incident took place.
Please,tell me that is not the reason for non-release.
You asked"Are we about to return to the John Compton era of staging riots in the valley.
Do you know who Sir John was trying to help in the valley?
He was fighting to end the wickedness Denis Barnard(KENNY ANTHONY'S FATHER)was doing to the people of the valley.
Do you know why a police station was built in La Caye?At the request of DENIS BERNARD.HE,the slave master wanted the people jailed anytime he thought they should be.
Denis Barnard oppressed the people of the dennery valley and Sir John worked hard to stop it,risking his life in the process.
If you call trying to stop the oppression of St.lucians by a wicked and evil man(kenny'S father)staging riots then you should be ashamed of yourself especially if you are a St.lucian
Did you know that GEORGE CHARLES was involved .HE and SIR John fought alongside each other to bring an end to the injustice that was taking place.CHECK THE HISTORY.
Now,to your question.St.lucians will stand up to put an end to the oppression,wickedness and the dis-respect that Kenny Anthony forces on the people.His father used his estates(economic power)to oppress the people,Kenny has a similar mindset.Hesees St.lucia as his plantation but he uses academic power to oppress and intimidate.He must be stopped through legal means and if you want to call it staging riots so be it.
The SLP andKENNY ANTHONY have always been afraid of Sir John.THEY and you see the actions of Chastenet and it reminds them of sir john.Immediately they went into panic mode.
Look at their actions since they realised that Chastenet was going to be UWP leader.Erratic,un-coordined,sloppy,reactionary,foolish,hateful and wicked.Tell me i am wrong.

Anonymous said...

The SLP socialists/liberals will break all rules to ensure they remain in power with the perks and money.

When the narcissistic Kenny became Leader of the Opposition he refused to go to the members lounge in Parliament, just because he was not PM. He refused to go to the dozens of functions every year he was invited to as LOO. What arrogance both by nuturing and nature.

So it is no surprise that they refused to invite Chastanet to the bridge opening to further their pilitical agenda. Phillip Pierre can never get anything right.

Their lack of decorum and appreciation for rules is what makes their management so disastereous and dangerous. A crass people who break all the rules bring us to a primitive and criminal state as a nation. That is why St Lucia is so backward because politicians like the Dalsons and Anthonys act without any respect for human or natural laws. This is then spread out to the rest of society as others follow suit.

It is this kind of perspective we lack when talking about nation building. As an underdeveloped liberal thinking people we think it is just about money. Look at Trinidad. All their money and they are still a primitive society because they have no respect for laws.
St Lucia puts accused rapists in key positions. They appoint incompetents like Rambally who shoukd be running a rum shop in Bexon. They sign international agreements for millions of dollars without consent of the right authorities. They do no follow up to audit expenditures.

This type of governance shows we have the trappings of civilization but in reality we operate on base wants with no descipline. I.e. we are primitive.

We have also an upper class and middle class that is no different. Their personal behaviour leaves a lot to be desired and they could care less about St Lucia.

Poor Helen!

Anonymous said...

If the country is to go forward, then some large infrastructrial projects that might take longer than 5 years to complete are likely.
Therefore, the party that starts a large project mightn't be the one to cut the ribbon at the opening ceremony.
And if that arrangement cannot be accepted by both parties, then nothing, on a large scale, will get done.
One party not wanting the other party to get the credit is childish.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
If the country is to go forward, then some large infrastructrial projects that might take longer than 5 years to complete are likely.
Therefore, the party that starts a large project mightn't be the one to cut the ribbon at the opening ceremony.
And if that arrangement cannot be accepted by both parties, then nothing, on a large scale, will get done.
One party not wanting the other party to get the credit is childish.


September 1, 2013 at 3:46 AM
----------------------

Exxxx-actly!!!

Now for the forensics. Do we have a technology in Saint Lucia called the telephone, and more recently, the cellphone?

Next question. Did Mr. Chastanet himself not REVEAL that he was contacted, by phone, BEFORE the partisan primitives, engaged in their downright base verbal assault on the government's representatives on that bridge? And such behaviour acceptable in a decent society?

When the leader of the primitives and yellow hornets arrived on the scene, did that leader condemn the unsavoury, despicable, and unwarranted behaviour of that base, and politically unsophisticated rabble, advising them to do the decent thing, allow the government of the day to govern?

Isn't it the same and identical Mr. Chastanet that presided over a Cabinet post, that VOTED. They consciously and deliberately VOTED, ladies and gentlemen. These supposedly intelligent people, they VOTED to give a particular minister and colleague a tax exemption on his properties, an exemption that was disallowed by the OECS Court of Appeals, as ILLEGAL?

Wasn't it the same and identical Mr. Chastanet, the judge in that OECS Court of Appeals case was extremely uncomfortable with the answers to questions put to him regarding this same Tuxedo Villa Affair?

From all of this, does it appear to you that this character CONSISTENTLY exercises good judgement in matters of right and wrong, according to the accepted norms of this society?

Again. does it appear to you then, that this leader, so-called, can exercise control on the wrong-doings by his followers (Forget about positively influencing fellow so-called MPs. He joined them in the notorious Tuxedo Villa Affair.), even if one might give the benefit of the doubt that he might have some capacity, the good conscience even, to recognize what is right, from what is wrong?

Ladies and gentlemen, I rest my case!

MR. "T" said...

ALBINO ALLEN "C" IS guilty by reason of shit-power intoxicated, insinuate insolent insanity.

this piece of SH*****IT that passes as de leader of this sewage---------waste have no INTEGRITY.

ALBINO ALLEN "C" DWELL IN HIS OWN DUG-OUT SEWAGE.

Anonymous said...

So Denis Barnard was Kenny's Father? Ma te sav.

Anonymous said...

Kenny's fatherrrrr was NAME DAVID AND HIS GRANDFATHER WAS GEORGE PUT THAT IN YOUR KAKA-POUL HEAD.

Anonymous said...

Dat is all water 'neath (the) bridge.

We still have to deal with saboteurs on the bridge.

Anonymous said...

Two "classic" movies come to mind; "A Bridge to Far" & " Bridge Over the River Kwai" -if only this story would live up to their zesty impassioned determinism /resolve.

MR. "T" said...

is this the DEVIL'S BRIDGE THAT KENNY'S GRANDFATHER BUILD SOME PLACE IN BALKA?? JUST ASKING!!!

IS "T CHAST" THE DOG HE SEND OVER FOR THE DEVIL???

Anonymous said...

Mr T - whether you like Chastanet or not, why do you make such insulting references about his skin colour. You are a racist moron.

Anonymous said...

There clearly are racists on this board.

Their constant reference to Chastanet's whiteness and castigating him based on skin colour is proof enough.

Whether this represents their own repugnance at their own blackness or a victimhood mentality to excuse their failure in life, the fact is they are ignorant and primitive discriminative RACISTS.
You can almost make a call on their status in life: the product of a single mother upbringing, ill educated, prone to alcohol or drug use, a failure at work, a woman beater with children from a few women or a woman who has had a few abortions, two or three kids from different men and waiting for government to give them a work.

Bob quoted Haille Selassie I when he said "When the colour of a man's skin is of no more significance than the colour of his eyes'.
For the ignorant racists here their blackness is their excuse for for their abject failure as it is for too many of our people from Brooklyn to Castries.

Anonymous said...

All I know that Chastanet said 'Chick, chick, Chick. Chick' um., chick 'um, chick come.' And you know what? The UWP yardfowls came running to the bridge to make trouble.

Doh worry wid them House Niggers and Uncle Toms. They doh know any better than to follow and defend anything the white hand me downs from our slave past want them to do. They are even ready to copy and are quite ready to do all the saloptay of their hand me down khaki-coloured favourites ask, in exchange for their anticipated pay day of political handouts and crumbs.

What more should anybody really expect from a people, who only got their sense of manners and decency from their parents learning from the behaviour of rough-necks and the lower class sent by absentee landlords, whilst their parents eked out a hand-to-mouth living, not just too long ago, as our political hangers-on and yardfowls are doing today, but on 'terre la co-panie'?

Simply put. They don't know better. They don't low class manners from good manners, even and especially when, their khaki-coloured Massas doh know the friggin difference!

DaProdigalSon said...

Its so sad to read these comments. Its painful to watch you destroy each other, verbally. The name calling, the 'maypwee', none of that will solve anything. Wow, such disgraceful attacks on one another, over party affiliation. None of you give a damn about St Lucia. You should all be dumped on some deserted, barren island and left to fight amongst yourselves. I guess its happening already. Shame on all of you.

Anonymous said...

Only the coalition of country bookies, House Niggers and Uncle Toms can find refuge in calling anybody a racist, for demanding that persons who become leaders of this country of 98 percent black people, look like the 98 percent, speak and understand the basic language of the majority 98%, and walk a mile in the shoes of the mainly 98%, by having some familiarity with some of their hardships, and share some of the aspirations of the majority 98% black population.

Is that too much to friggin well ask, after only being given phony independence, and only having been left with the clothes on their backs as their personal possession after so-called emancipation?

Who since then has taken on board first and foremost, the welfare of the majority black population? Why do we have to have STEP as the only source of legitimate employment for generations of people who are born poor and will die poor, unless they now engage in the narcotics industry?

Anonymous said...

Do you know how stupid this picture makes you all look? You're arguing over (and your politicians) about opening a bridge? Why can't they both just be there? Or is it always a tit for tat thing? How about you just open the bridge and get on with some more work?

All patting yourselves on the back for something which everyone else takes for granted. You know there's former war torn African countries are doing better!

Anonymous said...

You are out of it. Why don't you just stay out of it You do not have to face the same old shit of this party or that party headed by and supported by friggin idiots.

Anonymous said...

This is absolute SALOP-TAY by both the United Workers Party and the Labour Party.

Thse folks are hellbent on demonstrating that neither Party is worth any value to the people of St. Lucia.

Anonymous said...

September 02 at 1.12PM well said. EXCELLENT STATEMENT INDEED!

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
All I know that Chastanet said 'Chick, chick, Chick. Chick' um., chick 'um, chick come.' And you know what? The UWP yardfowls came running to the bridge to make trouble.

Doh worry wid them House Niggers and Uncle Toms. They doh know any better than to follow and defend anything the white hand me downs from our slave past want them to do. They are even ready to copy and are quite ready to do all the saloptay of their hand me down khaki-coloured favourites ask, in exchange for their anticipated pay day of political handouts and crumbs.

What more should anybody really expect from a people, who only got their sense of manners and decency from their parents learning from the behaviour of rough-necks and the lower class sent by absentee landlords, whilst their parents eked out a hand-to-mouth living, not just too long ago, as our political hangers-on and yardfowls are doing today, but on 'terre la co-panie'?

Simply put. They don't know better. They don't low class manners from good manners, even and especially when, their khaki-coloured Massas doh know the friggin difference!


September 2, 2013 at 11:49 AM

Anonymous said...

cOULD IT BE THAT WHEN cHASTENET SAID HE WASat laborite and as he has lied before that he was up by litten lamontagne at fond doux.
He needs to really answer this.
When he's at Soufriere where does he stay. Litten and eroline. So another lie again.
I would like anyone to tell me that between the two parties, Which one has had the most corrupt minister who have embezzeled millions from st lucia from john Compton era until Stevenson king.
Am waiting for a positive response.



Anonymous said...

As a matter of protocol did chastenet had to make himself like a fool.
I support Alva statement that chastenet is not leadership material. one of the biggest joke within the uwp. Stevenson king would not have succumb himself to such shame, Whether tape or not, His government is not in power, nor he has. King still has more power than him.

Anonymous said...

That picture says it all.

A bunch of Third World goons!

Anonymous said...

The person who thinks that keeping quiet means 'peace' - is a fool.

Typical liberal who stands for nothing but is upset when their iphone runs out of power. These kind of people are why the Jews ended up being murdered by the Nazis and why millions of Christians are killed and persecuted every year by Islamic facists and we say nothing in our cosy countries. Just recently a Catholic priest had his head severed with a kitchen knife in Syria by Islamists - it is on You Tube - and none of you liberal clowns either know about it or will say anything about it becaise you all want 'peace'.


To accomplish anything in life you have to fight evil.
The evil of the racists on this board has to be confronted.

I personally do not think Chastanet will be worth anything as a leader but I do know that the racists on this board should not be asking to disqualify him because of his skin colour.

Keeping quiet about it does not solve the problem of these evil people.

Anonymous said...

All the nig nogs, Uncle Toms, yardfowls and quintessential country bookies felt that all they had to do was to present a khaki-coloured person as leader. No matter how flawed that character. No matter past infelicities and wrong-doing.

Saint Lucians would simply genuflect as usual.

Hell no!

None of the UWP cabinet members that were party to the Tuxedo Villa Affair, robbing the purse should not have the gall to present themselves as candidates for anything ever again!

Chastanet' colour is quite and just co-incidental.

It is only House Niggers, Uncle Toms and yard-fowl that are pretending to be blind to the facts. They all trying to hide the glib label of racism. It is just simply that.

UWP please don't bother to continue presenting nor offering your recycled and flawed candidates, political bandits, drug barons, liars, goons, idiots, and social maggots feasting on the gangrened parts of the country as suitable to represent us all.

You. Not all of us.

It is time to turn a friggin new leaf in Saint Lucia.

UWP had choice. They in their corrupt minds thought that it is just going to be business as usual.

Hell no! Take that back. Given the straightened economic circumstances, the people have had it up to here.

Anonymous said...

Chick-chick-chickum! LOL!
Anonymous said...
All I know that Chastanet said 'Chick, chick, Chick. Chick' um., chick 'um, chick come.' And you know what? The UWP yardfowls came running to the bridge to make trouble.

Doh worry wid them House Niggers and Uncle Toms. They doh know any better than to follow and defend anything the white hand me downs from our slave past want them to do. They are even ready to copy and are quite ready to do all the saloptay of their hand me down khaki-coloured favourites ask, in exchange for their anticipated pay day of political handouts and crumbs.

What more should anybody really expect from a people, who only got their sense of manners and decency from their parents learning from the behaviour of rough-necks and the lower class sent by absentee landlords, whilst their parents eked out a hand-to-mouth living, not just too long ago, as our political hangers-on and yardfowls are doing today, but on 'terre la co-panie'?

Simply put. They don't know better. They don't low class manners from good manners, even and especially when, their khaki-coloured Massas doh know the friggin difference!

==========
Exactly! Some have no f-inn class!


Anonymous said...

Now I see it. The SLP will run the next election on RACIST doctrine. Oh how are the mighty fallen?
I never thought I would live to see the day when our people would stoop so low as to look at peoples skin colour to choose as their leader.
To think that the ones who are pushing this depend, to a great extent on those with white pigmentation for a living. Look at Chavez, Castro, the Chinese and TaeWanese, white tourists, etc etc.
I don't suppose it makes a difference with you bigots, but only If you realize how stupid you sound on here, you would stop this nonsense.
( P.S. there are countries that are monitoring everything here; The USA, Canada & the UK. bigotry will not help us.)

Anonymous said...

So for centuries the whites have promulgated their theories implicit and explicitly about white entitlement and superiority. Just plant a flag and place a set of cannons alongside it and the continent is yours.

They never entered into negotiations with the natives. Automatically they were inferior and made second-class citizens. They did not have equal rights and some were even enslaved in the process.

If 'emancipated' with all the material possessions left were the shirts on their backs, their welfare was only grudging taken care of as in the post-emancipation colonial period. Handpicked representatives looking like them were placed in charge.

And these selectees continued in the same vein. Grudgingly incremental gains like useless and phony independence.

But today, people are tied of the chicanery and the deceit and ask for representatives that look like them, and have walked a mile in their shoes, that is racism? That is bigotry? Such skullduggery as our brainless, and brainwashed neo-colonialist want us to accept flies in the face of logic and reason.

Idiot. The countries are monitoring to see whether we are just as bigoted as they are?

Anonymous said...

After the election of 1997 Didn't john Compton started the tunnel road, Who completed it, Who had the ceremony, Did John Compton came at the ceremony and made himself a fool, no he was more a diplomat than Allen. So why chastenet had to make himself a complete jerk, he should have advice his supporters to retreat and allow the government and his representative to do what is required by law.
Now as he said he was in laborie, I beg to defer, another lie again and what role Litten Lamontagne played in him being there, Was he at fond doux estate where he sleeps,
Now again why Soufriere with chastenet, Haven't he learn his lesson, Castries Rejected him, Gros islet rejected him, why Soufriere, What are his real motives in wanting to represent the bread basket for st lucia.
What are his hidden agenda, The media as well as journalist needs to probe him.

Anonymous said...

After La Corbiniere had so much to say; about the labour party. The dog is back to its vomit.

Anonymous said...

Blogger above you mean the dog is licking up its vomit.

He complained continuously to folks in the central castries constituency about who did him what. Now he is like dog to its vomit. Shame, Shame, and more shame. No principles whatsoever.

Anonymous said...

Have you noticed how La Corbiniere's eyes are fixed on the Deputy leader, Pip?

An interesting photo indeed.

Anonymous said...

A picture is a snapshot of an instant. It is not a movie. So what are you trying to say?

Anonymous said...

Chastanet said 'Chick, chick, chick, chick. Chick um, chick um, chick come.' And the UWP yard fowls rushed to the Soufriere bridge, as expected to make trouble.

Anonymous said...

Please tell us so that the rest of us can just ignore it for what it is.

Power-hungry, desperate and growing more and more frustrated every day, what a sorry picture this pathetic carpetbagger cuts!

Unelected and unemployed, maybe, that one perhaps is even unemployable, like those people in the STEP programme looking for a nice political job getting other people's money, when is Chastanet's next publicity and attention-getting stunt?