Saturday, January 4, 2014

New Years Message

13 comments:

Son-of-man said...

/

Surah Maryam/Mary the mother of Jesus

They say: "(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!" (88)

Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous! (89)

At it the skies are ready to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to fall down in utter ruin. (90)

That they should invoke a son for (Allah) Most Gracious. (91)

For it is not consonant with the majesty of (Allah) Most Gracious that He should beget a son. (92)

Not one of the beings in the heavens and the earth but must come to (Allah) Most Gracious as a servant. (93)

He does take an account of them (all), and hath numbered them (all) exactly. (94)

And every one of them will come to him singly on the Day of Judgment. (95)

On those who believe and work deeds of righteousness, will (Allah) Most Gracious bestow Love. (96)

So have We made the (Qur'an) easy in thine own tongue, that with it thou mayest give Glad Tidings to the righteous and warnings to people given to contention. (97)

But how many (countless) generation before them have We destroyed? Canst thou find a single one of them (now) or hear (so much as) a whisper of them? (98)


Surah Al-Ala
In the name of Allah Most Gracious Most Merciful.

Glorify the name of thy Guardian-Lord Most High, (1)

Who hath created, and further, given order and proportion; (2)

Who hath ordained laws. And granted guidance; (3)

And Who bringeth out the (green and luscious) pasture. (4)

And then doth make it (but) swarthy stubble. (5)

By degrees shall We teach thee to declare (the Message), so thou shalt not forget, (6)

Except as Allah wills: For He knoweth what is manifest and what is hidden. (7)

And We will make it easy for thee (to follow) the simple (Path). (8)

Therefore give admonition in case the admonition profits (the hearer). (9)
The admonition will be received by those who fear (Allah): (10)

But it will be avoided by those most unfortunate ones. (11)

Who will enter the Great Fire, (12)

In which they will then neither die nor live. (13)

But those will prosper who purifies themselves. (14)

And glorify the name of their Guardian-Lord, and (lift their hearts) in Prayer. (15)

Nay (behold), ye prefer the life of this world; (16)

But the Hereafter is better and more enduring. (17)

And this is in the Books of the earliest (Revelations)― (18)

The Books of Abraham and Moses. (19)


.

Son-of-man said...

/

Rivas, "Ou pas ka tan":


I make no pretense to express my disdain for your empty words of Satanic origin, but with irony, here's something I learnt in Catechism at Aloysius R.C.Boys on Brazil Street: “What doth it profit a man, if he gains the whole world and suffers the loss of his own soul”, at best this is how I remember it.

If your heart was not diseased, you would not wear these elaborate demonic costumes which is intended to deceive the congregation, while teaching them Not to read the final Revelation to mankind from the Creator of the Universe, the Holy Qur-an. Does the wearing of these papishow Dracula Capes and Costumes make your prayers better than mine?? Instead you teach them the Bible of King James is God's Truth and God had his only baby with a man's wife – there is no sin greater than to lie against Allah/God; it is the ONLY SIN that God does NOT FORGIVE.

Surah An-Nisa/The Woman

Lo! Allah forgiveth not that a partner should be ascribed unto Him. He forgiveth (all) save that to whom He will. Whoso ascribeth partners to Allah, he hath indeed invented a tremendous sin. (48)

Hast thou not seen those who praise themselves for purity? Nay, Allah purifieth whom He will, and they will not be wronged even the hair upon a date-stone. (49)

See, how they invent lies about Allah! That of itself is flagrant sin. (50)

Hast thou not seen those unto whom a portion of the Scripture hath been given, how they believe in idols and false deities, and how they say of those (idolaters) who disbelieve: "These are more rightly guided than those who believe"? (51)

Those are they whom Allah hath cursed, and he whom Allah hath cursed, thou (O Muhammad) wilt find for him no helper. (52)

Rivas, now is the time to do what is Right, and Worship Allah/God alone – without partners, sons or ghost. God will provide for you. This Job of fooling people, will not benefit you. Remember, “What doth it profit a man, if he gains the whole world and suffers the loss of his own soul”?

Surah Al-Kahf/The Cave

Say: Shall We inform you who will be the greatest losers by their works? (103)

Those whose effort goeth astray in the life of the world, and yet they reckon that they do good work. (104)

Those are they who disbelieve in the revelations of their Lord and in the meeting with Him. Therefor their works are vain, and on the Day of Resurrection We assign no weight to them. (105)

That is their reward: hell, because they disbelieved, and made a jest of Our revelations and Our messengers. (106)

Lo! those who believe and do good works, theirs are the Gardens of Paradise for welcome, (107)


your brother Ex-Catholic, the Son-of-Man

OPTICAL said...

THE SON OF MAN

I SEE U ARE MATE EX-BROTHER
UALL HAVING ONE MOTHER MARY,LOL?

SON OF MAN READ THIS!

THE CHURCH CLOSES RANKS.

Emphasis upon the monarchal bishop who, it was believed, derived his authority by apostolic succession, led many to think of him as a center of unity, the depository of truth and the dispenser of the means of the grace of God through the sacraments. Many converts from the mystery religions may also have aided in the development of the concept of the separation of the clergy and laity as they emphasized the holiness of the bishop's position. The Lord's Supper and Baptism came to be rites that could only be performed adequately by an accredited minister. As the idea of the communion as a sacrifice to God develop, it enhanced the superior sanctity of the bishop as compared with the rank and file of the ordinary church members. Baptism as an act of initiation into the Christian Church was usually performed at Easter or Pentecost. At first apparently faith in Christ and a desire for baptism were the only requirement, but by the end of the second century a probationary period as a catechumen was added to test the reality of the experience of the convert. During this period of probation the catechumen attended services in the narthex of the church building and was not allowed to worship in the nave. Baptism was normally by immersion; on occasion affusion or pouring was practiced. Infant baptism and clinical baptism, the baptism of the sick, developed in this period. The Church increasingly hedged the two sacraments of the Lord's supper and Baptism around with requirements and rites which a priest alone could perform. The emergence of a cycle of feasts in the church year may be noted in this era. Easter, originating in the application of the Jewish Passover to the resurrection of Christ, seems to have been the earliest of the festival. Not until about 350 was Christmas adopted as a Christian festival and purge of its pagan elements. Lent, a forty-day period of penitence and restrain upon bodily appetites preceding Easter, had been accepted as a part of the churches' cycle of worship before the adoption of Christmas.

SON OF MAN (SON OF ADAM)
OVER TO YOUR EX-BROTHER IN CHRIST.

Have a joyful Easter my brethren's in unbelief.

OPTICAL said...

SON OF MAN!!!
THE ADOPTION OF WHAT????

Son-of-man said...

/

Dr. Optical,

Call to mind that it was not until the first ecumenical council at Nicea, that the Roman Emperor Constantine ordered the Church of Rome, Roman Catholic to start worshipping the image of Serapis, to honour the first Caucasian Pharaoh of Egypt, Ptolemy the First, when the Nicean Creed was invented.

The Council of Nicea was in 325AD and it was then the date of Easter was established to coincide with the Pagan Fertility worship of the Spring goddess Ēostre.

I am taken aback by the writer's statement that,” Not until about 350 was Christmas adopted as a Christian festival and purge of its pagan elements.” Did he say purged of pagan elements? The Christmas tree? What is that but Heathenism. The Mistletoe? The whole dammed thing is Devil Worship.

The Priest Arius kept telling the people that this Son of God was a fabrication, and to silence him this Ecumenical Council was called to counter Arius. That is why the second part of this document reads that way:

(1)We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible; and in one Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, the only-begotten of his Father, of the substance of the Father, God of God, Light of Light, very God of very God, begotten (γεννηθέντα), not made, being of one substance (ὁμοούσιον, consubstantialem) with the Father. By whom all things were made, both which be in heaven and in earth. Who for us men and for our salvation came down [from heaven] and was incarnate and was made man. He suffered and the third day he rose again, and ascended into heaven. And he shall come again to judge both the quick and the dead. And [we believe] in the Holy Ghost.

(2)And whosoever shall say that there was a time when the Son of God was not (ἤν ποτε ὅτε οὐκ ἦν), or that before he was begotten he was not, or that he was made of things that were not, or that he is of a different substance or essence [from the Father] or that he is a creature, or subject to change or conversion51—all that so say, the Catholic and Apostolic Church anathematizes them.


Ar-re-yous/Arius a scholar of Religion, was saying that this is a new invented lie. And there was NEVER a time when God/Allah had a son. All of his writings were burnt and he was exiled by Constantine the "Great". Arius died/killed a few years after the Council of Nicea - check it??

.

OPTICAL. said...

SON OF MAN
U ARE VERY RIGHT WITH THE HISTORY.
MY finding was taken from the book "ANCIENT CHURCH HISTORY"
5 B C.-A.D.590
THIS BOOK IS SO old even the author's name is not visible.

I also have quite a collection of DVD TAPES BOOKS ON THE HISTORYS THAT U SHARE WITH US SO LIBERAL.

Son-of-man said...

/

This White-Male-Worshiping is equivalent to drinking poison. The subliminal message from this White-Male God is you can never be as good as this White man, no matter how much you hot iron your hair and bleach your skin – the white male is superior. Now the worst of traitors is the Black Lucian Priest who stand before you on Sundays selling you the poison of White Supremacy for twenty pieces of silver while they play African.

OPTICAL. said...

SON OF MAN
PART OF A POEM.
NAME: PLEBEIAN BE YOUR SELF

I remember going to church in de R.C. on Saturday to confess sins I never commit;
and those pervert priest told you the sins you suppose to have done;
predictable, those were:
stealing sugar, fighting, lying, making vice;

plebeians in church have bugs on dem,
patricians. bigger bugs on dem,
dem bugs getting better feed;
de front seat was out of bounds for de plebeian--gate with owner superscription on, like book in heaven with de save name on it.
still we plebeian children did love going and sit there
before de nobles owner come.
when dem come, take one look at you, face screw, mouth set,
you get de massage, back to de plebeian section.
this was de season that de patricians and plebeians share things.

SON OF MAN
I will b very correct to say u remember those days. as I am sure those things happen 2 u also.

I know because I am from Castries.
all them big-shorts and them used 2 control de R.C. CHURCH.
buying big motorcar 4 them pedophiles white priest. and a few black priest bullers.

Son-of-man said...

/

A friend just posted this information on my News Feed:

Ptolemy 1 Meryamun Setepenre (c.a. 367-283 B.C.E- Before Common Era) (aka Soter) (“Soter” means savior) became the first European pharaoh of Egypt through military force led by Alexander the Greek (a.k.a Alexander the Great). When Ptolemy became pharaoh of Egypt, he wanted the Egyptians to consecrate him as a god. He wanted to be called a god because that was the title all of the pharaohs of Egypt were called prior to him. However, the people of Egypt refused to call him a god because they knew the only reason he became a pharaoh was through force, so in “305 BC -Ptolemy took the title of Pharaoh, taking the Egyptian name Meryamun Setepenre, which means “Beloved of Amun (Amun means God) Chosen of Ra(Ra means God)”, and because of the Egyptians refusal to acknowledge him as a God, he began killing the people of Egypt, which caused the Egyptian priests at Memphis to give into his request by agreeing to consecrate him to priesthood, in order to save their own lives.

The key words in the above passage to keep in mind during your reading: Meryamun, Setepenre, Soter, which are words that were used to create the fictitious character of JESUS CHRIST in AD by Roman Emperor Constantine (Meryamun, Setepenre, Soter were used in B.C). The images of Ptolemy below, which are similar to the images that are depicted as “Jesus” today, were forced upon the Africans and were ordered to be worshipped by the people of Rome. Let us continue to A.D.

Son-of-man said...

Story of White Male Worship contd.

What is Serapis? (Origin of JESUS CHRIST)

Ptolemy’s rule was to create a deity that would be worshipped by both the Egyptians and the Greeks. He created “Serapis “, the made up Graeco-Egyptian god that was invented in the 3rd century B.C., portrayed as Greek in appearance, but with Egyptian accessories, representing both wealth and resurrection.

“Egypt, which you commended to me my dearest Servianus, I have found to be wholly fickle and inconsistent and continually wafted about by every breath of fame. The worshippers of Serapis here are called Christians and those who are devoted to the god Serapis (I find) call themselves Bishops of Christ. Hadrian to Servianus 134 AD.”

Constantine and Arius

Constantine the Greek (a.k.a Constantine the Great) Roman Emperor from 306 to 337, is known for being the first Roman emperor to be converted to Christianity which strangely enough, Arius of Libya (256-356 AD) born of African descent centuries after Ptolemy 1, had a problem with the Roman empire teaching the Africans and the people of Rome to worship a statue and celebrating death. He was considered a heretic, a professed believer (of God), who maintains religious opinions contrary to those accepted by his or her church (what the religious authorities usually controlled by government deem as the truth). Because he started attracting so many followers due to his teachings that were contrary to the Romans, Constantine called the council by summoning all the bishops to discredit Arius, The Council of Nicaea. During the time when this meeting was called upon, there was no mention of Jesus Christ at all; no man had ever existed by the name JESUS Christ, and an important fact is that this all took place Anno Domino (AD) (which Christians claim means after the death of Christ) but in Latin means ‘in the year of the lord’. The name Jesus Christ didn’t exist before the meeting was called (read the statements made during that timeframe). It was only after this that they presented to the people the name JESUS CHRIST.

What Lord are they referring to? Kings have always been referred to as Lords or gods.

If Jesus Christ didn’t exist during the time this meeting took place nor ever heard of whom are people worshipping today? Serapis Christus?

Son-of-man said...

(Cont.) Just thought how many people are acquiring knowledge.

Nicean Creed – Jesus Christ is born

Nicean creed which became the statement of the Christian faith was written decreed and sanctified by 318 Roman Catholic bishops at the council in 325 AD (some believe this transformation took place “Council of Chalcedon” 451AD).

“We believe in one God the Father all-powerful of all things both seen and unseen one Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God the only begotten from the father, that is from the substance of the father, god from god, light from light, true god from true god, begotten not made, consubstantial with the father, through whom all things came to be both those in heaven and those in earth for us humans and for out salvation he came down and became incarnate became human suffered and rose up on the third day went up into the heavens is coming to judge the living and the dead and in the holy spirit” (The origin of the Trinity)

The authorities shut Arius down and threatened him with death to keep his mouth shut. They positioned the creed during the time when people started becoming aware of the lies and deception, and ordered all books to be burned; destroying all ancient writings, “no evidence no argument”, and the outcome was the transformation from Serapis Christus, which means Christ the Savior, to Jesus Christ by edict of Emperor Constantine in 325 AD.

Authors comment

Christians, do your research. There may have been a man that walked the earth in the land known as Nazareth that attempted to guide the people back to righteousness, but, this man was not JESUS CHRIST. You see no mention of any man in Nazareth named JESUS mentioned during the meetings in Rome, or of a woman named Mary (the virgin) giving birth to a child named Jesus.

This would explain why there is so much emphasis put on JESUS CHRIST in the bible, which further explains why God all of a sudden had to have a “son” (sun of God was turned to the son of God by Europeans, which is why every picture of Jesus has the sun behind his head. (Sun Ra, Sun of Ra (God)). The man you acknowledge as Jesus Christ of Nazareth was born in 4 BC; all of the above took place before that date.



“The only thing necessary for falsehood to triumph is for good men and good women to remain silent.”

Son-of-man said...

.

Dr. Optical,

One never forgets those things - my family had their name on the pew in that house of white Supremacy.

There was a bare-footed charcoal-black statue of some dead guy. I am still struggling with why his name sounded Poor.

Martin De Pooris??

Now if the Catholic Church really cared to help Lucians, they can sell one of their Palaces and build 100 bridges and rebuild all the houses and the roads that were destroyed. Check this Catholic Palace. He spent 31,000,000 Euros just to "Paint" it up.

Bishop’s suspension a symptom of German Catholic Church’s wealth

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/lifestyle/57035346-80/church-german-catholic-elst.html.csp



.

Son-of-man said...

/

Don't forget that's U.S. dollars, Optical.

Other German clergymen have been chastised for lavish expenditures. Cardinal Reinhard Marx of Munich’s archdiocese spent around $11 million renovating the archbishop’s residence and another $13 million for a guesthouse in Rome.

Now Revas is asking you to sell your dasheen and give him your money - these people?? with the Vatican Banks and Gay Lobby.