However, we reserve the right to remove any comment considered inappropriate.
Saturday, March 26, 2011
CXC@Bordelais.Org
....................
2 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Earl, think again. Your logic is flawed. The Prisoners in Grenada's Richmond Hill Prison had post-secondary school education. It was therefore easy for them to continue their education at the university level. The prisoners at Bordelais hardly have primary school level education. They have done well to achieve a secondary education. I understand that with your secondary level education and years of active politics you have not done too well and probably need to go back to school. Do some courses to develop your logic and objective assessment of issues. Do not allow your politics to cloud your thinking.
Anonymous # 1, WHAT exactly are you trying to say? What about the writer's logic is flawed? You accuse the writer, Earl, of low-level educational attainment, but you yourself are yet to tell the readers just exactly WHAT is flawed about Earl's article or reasoning. This is not a defense of Earl!! But, read your comments properly and objectively, and you will see what I mean. In any case, I invite you to restructure or expand your comments, because your accusation of "flawed" logic is very wanting. Tell us please, what exactly is flawed about Earl's article? I noticed you brought politics into this. If your intention was to just attack Earl politically, then you can forget about my request for your kind enlightenment of the readership. Thanks. LANSIQUOT.
2 comments:
Earl, think again. Your logic is flawed. The Prisoners in Grenada's Richmond Hill Prison had post-secondary school education. It was therefore easy for them to continue their education at the university level. The prisoners at Bordelais hardly have primary school level education. They have done well to achieve a secondary education. I understand that with your secondary level education and years of active politics you have not done too well and probably need to go back to school. Do some courses to develop your logic and objective assessment of issues. Do not allow your politics to cloud your thinking.
Anonymous # 1, WHAT exactly are you trying to say? What about the writer's logic is flawed? You accuse the writer, Earl, of low-level educational attainment, but you yourself are yet to tell the readers just exactly WHAT is flawed about Earl's article or reasoning. This is not a defense of Earl!! But, read your comments properly and objectively, and you will see what I mean. In any case, I invite you to restructure or expand your comments, because your accusation of "flawed" logic is very wanting. Tell us please, what exactly is flawed about Earl's article? I noticed you brought politics into this. If your intention was to just attack Earl politically, then you can forget about my request for your kind enlightenment of the readership. Thanks. LANSIQUOT.
Post a Comment