Saturday, August 30, 2014

Unemployment In Paradise

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Very inspiring article indeed. Unfortunately there are too many of us who are living this reality. A harsh reality that in some cases is perpetuated or forced upon decent law abiding citizens by some criminals passing themselves off as lawyers.

Anonymous said...

First of all writer, your original premise is wrong, wrong , wrong. The rest of your case is a veritable "house of cards"; it collapses!

You assume. You assume too much. You assume, firstly that there are experts. That went unchallenged in your mind. You never gave a single thought to ask this question: "Experts in what areas?"

Now, even if you said "experts in economics", then the follow-up question is: what are the ranges of their expertise? Why? There are economists and there are economists.

There are experts. And there are experts. George Santanyana once quipped this regarding experts: "One who knows more and more about less and less, until he knows everything about nothing." Unquote.

We need to know the forte of the individual experts before we can (as the creole says) "put our hands in the fire for them", so to speak.

To the initiated, when you observe the vacuity of some of the arguments made by the actors regarding the coming negotiations of the wage cuts, the necessary expertise is glaring absent especially regarding the GNT party.

The tenor or direction of thought has precious little to do with wage settlements in a bureaucracy, recorded inflation, cost of living, VAT adjustments, projected labour costs OVER the agreement period, and the staff complements in various departments that can be streamlined. We are not there yet. Novices, and bad-faith, win-lose political arguments dominate.

Next, and a critical factor is the recipient of all the expertise. Irrespective of the expertise available, once you put more than one economist together, there is hardly any chance that they will see eye to eye on any one issue. There are just too many schools of thought. Too many variables. No reliable data.

Pure academic economists, and especially those straight out of the classroom always give a high percentage of "pie in the sky", textbook, no-context solutions.

Even our own Sir Arthur Lewis and Nobel laureates like Dr. Paul Krugman and Dr. Joseph Stiglitz, all Nobel prize winners in Economics, very heavy-hitters and highly regarded, do come under serious fire for their recommendations.

If Saint Lucia is depending on just one or two economists, without the experience, or with foci other than on those required by the conditions facing the country at the time, the recommendations are going to be very inappropriate -- irrelevant even.

But most importantly, the recipients or end-users of their presumably sound advice and expertise must have the capacity to absorb and to weigh up, all the conflicting arguments and approaches that are going to be presented. As evidenced by recent history, the incumbents on the receiving end do not appear to be always so equipped or educated. The mistakes pile up.

Anecdotally, we have the story of an incumbent in the White House in the US, where most decisions involving complex arguments and decision making were based and predicated more on personal relationships, and who the president spoke with -- last.

Saint Lucia faces three distinct challenges:
1. Not enough diversification in economic viewpoints being aired and discussed or even entertained.
2. Suspect Ministers of Finance without the educational and economic substrate to assimilate the complexities of the assumptions behind expert recommendations. They do not know what to ask and when. There are just too many givens.
3. A very polarized and tribal political country where leaders are selected NOT ON ANY PERFORMANCE CRITERIA, but on mere parochialisms of family, family names, residence, and other useless emotional ties to candidates like their ethnic make-up. Throw in a university degree with a thesis like "The Mating Habits of the Maria Islands Zandolee" and that is "just what the doctor ordered".


Now, do you see why this country continues all adrift, and is being saddled with numerous square pegs in round holes with no relief in sight?

Son-of-man said...

George,

You must have missed your calling as a writer - your article captured my attention, materializing the individual until he stood or sat at a table across from me at the Castries Central Library.

George this was brilliant, and just a fantastic piece of writing, I just enjoyed it so much. Perhaps it's because of my awareness of the social injustices that condemn too many of our people to poverty and the working class to a subsistence level of existence while the elitist legislate a pay cut. Perhaps it's the imperial bullying that murdered millions in Iraq and Afghanistan. Whatever it was, this piece had a sense of morality that magnified the products of a moral void that permeates the society, shinning a light upon those who can only fathom their own personal troubles.

Unknown said...

1:02
WOW! WowzeH

A well supported TREATISE!

The teacups in the Hewanorra Tower are still rattling in their saucers from the sonic boom of your fly by.

I am still scratching my head and rereading your scintillating treatise.

Man oh man did my dendrites ever record a synaptic event as in lining up all 777 at a Sand's Casino Slot Machine.

You took my head to school.

Diana said...

George that was indeed a great article and enlightening making one acutely aware of this crucial problem in St.Lucia. You have highlighted that when a man does not have earning power it takes away so much from his spirit and leaves him vulnerable in trying to survive.
Diana

Anonymous said...

...here this guy wrote a heartfelt article from which someone can take solace: George didn't become a criminal, neither did he became an alcoholic; he persevered to better things! But it took one word (expert).... for this cock-sucker at 1:02PM to proceed to his usual drivel.